The Herald

All concerned must be found responsible for Enyobeni Tavern tragedy, lawyers argue

Owners, bouncers, police and Eastern Cape Liquor Board ‘failed in the performance of their duties’

The various parties in the Enyobeni inquest, held to determine if anyone should be held criminally liable for the deaths of 21 young people at the tavern in June 2022, are ready to make their closing addresses, arguing in the Mdantsane magistrate’s court as to who should be held accountable.
Enyobeni The various parties in the Enyobeni inquest, held to determine if anyone should be held criminally liable for the deaths of 21 young people at the tavern in June 2022, are ready to make their closing addresses, arguing in the Mdantsane magistrate’s court as to who should be held accountable.Picture: Michael Pinyana

Lawyers representing the families of the 21 young people who died in the Enyobeni Tavern disaster have asked the inquest at the Mdantsane Regional Court to find the tavern owners, bouncers, police, Eastern Cape Liquor Board and its relevant employees responsible for the deaths.

Attorney Vuyisile Magqabi, for the families, argued on Monday that “no-one stands to be spared, particularly those who have failed in the performance of their duties”.

The 21 young people who died at the Scenery Park tavern were aged between 13 and 21. Several other patrons were injured.

Magqabi said Siyakhangela and Vuyokazi Ndevu, manager and owner of the tavern, had broken laws and regulations in the running of the establishment.

The Ndevus and former bouncer Thembisa Diko are people of interest in the inquest.

The inquest, which started in July 2024, is being held to determine whether anyone should be held criminally liable for the deaths.

Magqabi argued that the tragedy could have been prevented if minors had been stopped from entering the premises; if police had monitored the tavern and acted on repeated complaints about unlawful activity; and if the liquor board had used the powers available to it before the tragedy.

“Put differently, was it reasonably foreseeable that an occurrence of this nature would prevail given the dereliction of duty as set out?

“Or what other consequence was foreseeable by those responsible other than what would have occurred?” Magqabi said.

A warrant of arrest has been issued for former Enyobeni Tavern bouncer Thembisa Diko – who failed to appear in the inquest court – but was stayed until the next court date. The absence of Diko, a person of interest in the inquest held to determine if anyone should be held criminally liable for the deaths of 21 youngsters at the tavern in June 2022, is among the reasons the case was postponed. The inquest was scheduled for closing addresses by the evidence leader and the attorneys representing the bereaved families, Diko and tavern owner and manager Vuyokazi and Siyakhangela Ndevu, who are also people of interest. But it was postponed because the presiding magistrate, Mvuselelo Malindi, was also absent and said to be bereaved. The court heard that Mzwanele Nkebe, who had represented Diko since the inquest started, was no longer working for Legal Aid SA. Another lawyer had been found for her, but she heard only this week he would be representing her. Evidence leader advocate Luvuyo Vena said: “It appears even if the magistrate were here and ready to proceed, in the absence of Mr Nkebe, my colleague, who is here, only heard this morning [he will stand in for Nkebe]. “They have not yet even located the file. They need some time to find the file and also prepare.” The matter was postponed to February 23. “Ms Diko is not in court. We don’t know where she is,” Vena said. “She has been attending the court religiously. She was warned on the last day to be here. “Chances are she may have confused the dates. “However, since she was warned to be here today, I request that a warrant for her arrest be authorised but be stayed until February 23.” The closing addresses have been postponed a handful of times since last year. Outside court, Ntombizonke Mgangala, who was speaking on behalf of the bereaved families, said they were not happy with the postponements. “We were assured last time that today is going to be the day. “We are a bit shaken, but it’s something that is beyond our control.” Click here to join the Daily Dispatch’s WhatsApp channel and get the latest news delivered straight to your phone. Daily Dispatch

Relatives of the deceased sat in the public gallery as he addressed the court.

Magqabi said police had failed to act despite repeated complaints from the public.

There had been a breach of constitutional rights relating to dignity, a safe and healthy environment, health and children’s rights, he said.

He also cited alleged breaches of the Eastern Cape Liquor Act, including failure to issue a compliance notice, the prohibition on selling liquor to minors, trading-hour provisions, the failure of inspectors to perform their duties, and the board’s alleged failure to invoke its suspension powers.

Magqabi said Buffalo City bylaws, the National Liquor Policy of 2016 and the Eastern Cape Liquor Act of 2003 had also been flouted, and that action was taken only after the tragedy.

“There was no medical, nor first aid interventions initiated nor procured, nor were there ... trained personnel on the premises and there was zero effort on the part of the staff … to attempt to mitigate nor to seek to prevent the deaths,” he said.

If one allows an uncertified structure to be overcrowded ... and lock the doors with no ventilation and with the police and [liquor board] failing to move an inch despite being empowered to do so, the same outcome would and should have been envisaged, even if in different forms

Magqabi argued there was a direct link between the conduct or omissions of the police, liquor board officials, the Ndevus and their employees and the deaths of the victims.

“If one allows an uncertified structure to be overcrowded ... and lock the doors with no ventilation and with the police and [liquor board] failing to move an inch despite being empowered to do so, the same outcome would and should have been envisaged, even if in different forms,” he said.

He described the evidence of police and the liquor board as showing a “horrific lack of care” by institutions entrusted with protecting citizens.

The court heard complaints about the tavern dated back to 2021, when residents raised concerns over loud music and other alleged unlawful activities.

Affidavits from community members were later submitted to authorities.

“It is worthy to note that despite the slightly progressive steps undertaken to engage the community members (neighbours) on their complaints and further referral to the Eastern Cape Liquor Board, it is evident that nothing pre-emptive was ever done until the tragedy occurred,” Magqabi said.

Diko testified during the hearing that he used pepper spray on the night of the tragedy to disperse a crowd pushing its way into the tavern.

Patrons also testified about pepper spray being used.

“There can be little doubt that there was pepper spray. Pepper spray would have enlivened the pandemonium,” Magqabi said.

The inquest to determine if anyone should be held criminally liable for the deaths of 21 young people at the Enyobeni Tavern was postponed on Monday because evidence transcripts were incomplete. Closing arguments had been scheduled to be heard at the inquest in the Mdantsane regional court, ahead of the final verdict. However, presiding magistrate Mvuselelo Malindi postponed it to Tuesday. That is when evidence leader Luvuyo Vena; attorney Vuyisile Magqabi, who represents the families of the 21 young people who died in June 2022 at the Scenery Park tavern; Mzwanele Nkebe, who represents former bouncer Thembisa Diko; and tavern manager and owner Siyakhangela and Vuyokazi Ndevu, who represent themselves, and the court, will compare the transcribed recordings. The transcribed record includes all the witnesses who testified since the inquest started in 2023. The Ndevus and Diko are people of interest in the inquest. On Monday, all the parties confirmed the transcribed record was not complete. Vena said though the matter was in court for closing arguments, while preparing his arguments, he noticed that the record was not complete. He said the evidence of some witnesses who testified during the lengthy inquest was incomplete — either showing evidence-in-chief only or showing cross-examination only, or parts of both. Vena asked for a postponement so all the parties could go through the transcripts to assess the totality of the evidence and see what was missing, also the exact dates of the missing evidence. “I did try to supplement the missing notes with my notes, but after all a complete record will be needed,” Vena said. Magqabi, Nkebe and the Ndevus had no objection to the postponement. Siyakhangela Ndevu said: “We have also seen there’s missing evidence on record.” The inquest has been marred throughout the proceedings by postponements for various reasons, including faulty recording machines, changing courts and unavailability of interpreters, distraught witnesses and the absence of attorneys. Daily Dispatch

He asked the inquest to find the Ndevus, bouncers and employees working on the night, police and liquor board officials were responsible for the deaths and accordingly culpable.

Magqabi also called for the matter to be referred for criminal prosecution.

He said the children had gone to the tavern, “but once in they became Siyakhangela Ndevu’s responsibility”.

Diko’s attorney, Luntu Mdingi, the self-represented Ndevus, and evidence leader advocate Luvuyo Vena are expected to make their addresses on Tuesday.

Daily Dispatch